Rethinking Portfolio Allocations
Recently, my colleague Amy Arnott emphasized the importance of rebalancing investment portfolios. Her insights were compelling: with stock markets experiencing substantial growth while other asset classes lagged, many investors may find their asset allocations increasingly imbalanced if they haven’t made adjustments for some time.
Analyzing Mutual Fund Trends
Building on Amy’s arguments, I delved into mutual fund data over the past decade to investigate how asset allocations have evolved based on fund holdings. The data reinforces Amy’s perspective: Investors are currently holding a larger portion of their assets in stocks (78%) compared to a decade ago (75%), while bond allocations have decreased from 25% to just 22% over the same period.
To analyze fund investors’ allocations more thoroughly, I compiled the total net assets for each stock, bond, and allocation fund (excluding funds of funds) on a monthly basis. Applying the monthly percentage allocations across various asset classes, I calculated the overall dollar allocations for stocks, bonds, cash, and other assets. This analysis allowed me to track fund investors’ percentage allocations over time.
Dollar Representation of Overexposure
In financial terms, I estimate that fund investors are currently overexposed to equities and under-allocated to bonds by approximately $800 billion. This figure is derived from the total dollar value of fund investments as of November 30, 2024, which stands at roughly $20.5 trillion. By evaluating the average percentage of equities (75%) and fixed income (22%) from 2015, I compared these figures with current allocations to derive an adjustment figure for rebalancing back to previous percentiles.
The Shift to U.S. Equities
Furthermore, U.S. equities have increasingly dominated the stock portion of these portfolios. Ten years ago, the ratio of U.S. to foreign stock exposure was approximately 75% to 25%. Currently, it stands at 82% for U.S. stocks and only 18% for foreign, highlighting a significant shift.
Consistency in Target-Date Funds
An interesting observation is that the asset mix within allocation funds, such as target-date and target-risk funds, has remained remarkably stable. In 2015, this type of fund had about 64% allocated to stocks, with that distribution remaining consistent over time. These funds offer a glimpse into what could have been had investors regularly rebalanced their broader portfolios.
Market Influences
The substantial disparity in allocations can be attributed to market performance. Stocks, particularly U.S. equities, have significantly outperformed bonds and cash in the past decade, leading cumulative equity funds to witness around $12 trillion in market gains compared to bond funds.
Concerns Over Increased Risk
This trend of favoring equities, with a notable preference for U.S. stocks, raises some concerns. Colleague Christine Benz recently noted that most analysts had tempered their future return expectations for U.S. stocks, expecting better performance from non-U.S. equities and even forecasting higher returns for bonds. This indicates a potential misalignment in where investors are focusing their allocations.
Key Takeaways
Now may be the ideal time to reassess your asset allocations. Compare your current distribution with where it stood three, five, or even ten years ago. If you notice a shift but your investment goals, risk tolerance, and situation remain unchanged, it may be wise to rebalance your portfolio.
While the process of rebalancing may feel uncomfortable—shifting away from assets that have performed well towards those that seem less appealing—it’s important to remember that the anticipated higher returns from stocks come with accompanying risks, including the possibility of market downturns.
Considering Alternative Strategies
If you find rebalancing to be a cumbersome task or would prefer to avoid the emotional challenges associated with it, consider adopting a target-date or target-risk strategy that automatically rebalances for you. While this may involve relinquishing some control to the fund manager, these strategies have typically proven effective in maintaining balanced allocations at a reasonable cost while still participating in market gains.
Current Reads and Resources
Here are several intriguing resources I’m currently exploring:
- Dave Nadig discusses public/private convergence.
- John Rekenthaler shares insights on the stock market.
- Sam Ro highlights investment strategist forecasts.
- Cullen Roche explains rising interest rates.
- Ben Carlson delves into index concentration issues.
- Pimco provides its cyclical market outlook.
- Barry Ritholtz interviews Jonathan Clements on the Masters in Business podcast.
- Allan Roth experiments with direct indexing.
- For a broader range of investing and financial topics: Abnormal Returns.
Stay Connected
Your feedback matters! If you have thoughts, suggestions for future articles, or just want to share your insights, feel free to reach out via email. You can also find me on Twitter for additional discussions.
